test
Ich wurde neulich von SWR Wissen zum Thema #PFAS Sanierung in Boden und Grundwasser interviewt.
Die ganze Sendung gibt‘s als Podcast oder hier
Talks at EGU meeting
I’m happy to be able to give two presentations at the #EGU24 meeting in Vienna on Monday April 15, 2024
Time | ID | Session | Title | Authors :–:|:–:|–|:–:|– 08:55–09:05 | EGU24-7899 | HS8.1.7 | Immobilization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) – Experimental and Model-based Analysis of Leaching Behavior | Claus Haslauer, Thomas Bierbaum, Simon Kleinknecht, and Tobias Junginger 15:25–15:35 | EGU24-7820 | HS3.9 | Data-driven surrogate-based Bayesian model calibration for predicting vadose zone temperatures in drinking water supply pipes | Ilja Kröker, Elisabeth Nißler, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, and Claus Haslauer
Looking forward to meet you in Vienna! The conference is in Vienna, Austria & Online | 14–19 April 2024
VEGAS – workshop
Last week we had our two-day @VegasIws@mathstodon.xyz workshop in the Black Forrest. We role-played group communication (the “NASA-exercise”), discussed research data management and publications as relevant for @VegasIws@mathstodon.xyz, dreamed up projects, ate, drank and experienced the firs of the Black Forrest
NetNewsWire RSS Reader @NetNewsWire on the Mac is out with Version 6.0. For me, most notably, includes syncing via iCloud (e.g., between laptop and desktop). It also includes the ability to “subscribe” to Twitter feeds and/or searches.
The latest version 22 of Ulysses is supporting micro.blog. MarsEdit does so since a while. Since I use MarsEdit for my WordPress Blog and jupyter notebooks for my own site via pelican, I though I give Ulysses a try for micro.blog. The fact that I maintain three blogish-things has emerged over time. But why not. All I need is more inspiration to be more active (again).
#Blogging
A lot of cool people with lots of cool content are on Peter Rukavina’s blog roll!
Nice article on conditional probabilities, @drdrang@mastodon.cloud, especially this table (⬇︎) as well as on the effect of a second screening. Am I the only one missing the link to the CNN article?
Have Don't have
antibodies antibodies
-------------------------------------------------
Test positive 4,500 4,750 | 9,250
Test negative 500 90,250 | 90,750
-------------------------------------------------
5,000 95,000 | 100,000